India's unexpected 0-2 series loss to the Proteas in the just finished red-ball series has left the team reeling.
Earlier this week, South Africa handed India a record Test defeat by runs, contrary to predictions. It was the Proteas' initial series triumph in the subcontinent in two and a half decades and India's second defeat at home in just one year after a 12-year unbeaten run.
The winning rhythm built over the previous half-year has almost disappeared and the futures of multiple squad members - as well as head mentor Gautam Gambhir - now hang in the balance.
The new-look squad's strong showing in England this summer, under a fresh leadership, pointed to a successful handover post the near-simultaneous exits of veterans R Ashwin, Rohit Sharma, and Virat Kohli.
A facile 2-0 triumph over the Windies at the commencement of the home season boosted that belief, before the South Africans arrived to deliver a fell blow.
India were somewhat unlucky that leader Shubman Gill suffered an injury very early in the initial match and was ruled out in the series. Yet that neither explains nor absolves the squad of the well below standard showing in the two games against South Africa.
Several established players took a hit, and a few members hoping for extended tenures in Tests were exposed as not yet good enough - technically or mentally - for the format.
This was the second clean sweep in home conditions endured by India in just more than a year. In 2024, underestimated New Zealand had secured a remarkable 3-0 win which practically cost India a berth in the Test championship finale.
The recent defeat to the Proteas risks harming the team's hopes of qualifying for the showpiece of this season too.
Previously ranked third in the WTC table before the series, the side have been relegated to the fifth spot. Though nine additional matches are remaining, half of these are against the Aussies. Ordinarily, competing on home turf would be a major plus - even when facing the mighty Aussies. Yet the debacles against New Zealand and the Proteas offer no room for such assurance.
The national team's vulnerability in red-ball cricket has been significantly highlighted. That said, why the team have fared so badly in Tests on home soil in recent times is continues to confuse.
From the year 2000 onwards, India were regarded as invincible in red-ball cricket at home. In hot, humid conditions and on pitches that helped spin and aided their squad, the hosts dominated all comers. The odd series defeat, such as in the 2012-13 season against the English, was viewed as an anomaly.
Now, India look to be easy pickings in their own backyard.
Facing the Kiwis in last year and the Proteas this year, the home side were defeated by their own tactics. The surfaces they developed to favor their game went wrong completely, as opponents used them more effectively, beating the Indian batters and bowlers when it counted the most.
A few experts argue that India is floundering in home conditions because home surfaces have been changed from spinning tracks to pace-friendly pitches to train the squad to do well overseas.
Others highlight that the domestic T20 league, in which many overseas players participate, has reduced the surprise and difficulty subcontinental pitches would pose to them earlier.
Even though there is some truth in these views, it fails to account for why the side's results at home have seen such a staggering decline.
The majority of ex-cricketers identify a multi-faceted challenge, not limited to a few causes.
Experts and participants have identified various flaws following India's embarrassing defeat to the South Africans: not respecting the foe, lack of preparation, poor choices, arrogance, regular alterations of the team lineup, and emphasizing white-ball over Test cricket.
This was clear in the performances of the side.
Players such as Rishabh Pant and Jaiswal, of whom great things were anticipated, suffered for their nonchalance, while Sai Sudarshan, Nitish Kumar Reddy, and Jurel - who were looking to cement their place in the team - fell short in technique and temperament, suffering the consequences for their casual attitude.
A small number - Ravindra Jadeja, Jasprit Bumrah, Kuldeep, Mohammed Siraj and Sundar - lived up to their talent and reputation - but not sufficiently to secure victories.
The analysis didn't spare not only the cricketers - selectors and support staff were also questioned, spurred on by distraught fans and outspoken ex-cricketers. Under focus of the criticism was mentor Gautam Gambhir.
At his post-series press
A seasoned gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering UK casino trends and strategies.